On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 20:39, Jonas Smedegaard <d...@jones.dk> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 08:16:11PM +0200, Alexander Shulgin wrote: >> >> As I look around this, I see that "ITP" means "Intent to Package". >> Isn't there someone who's readily trying to package png++ or it's more >> like 'request to package'? If it's more like a wishlist thing, I >> think I can try to package it myself. But I give no ETAs. ;) > > RFP means Request For Packaging - i.e. please can someone package this. > > ITP means Intend To Package - i.e. This is in planning stage of actually > getting packaged. > > And in this case it was a short process: I filed the ITP while actually > packaging, and the package was sent to Debian as soon as the Bug Tracker > responded with a bug number that I could tie to the initial release.
OK, thanks for explanation. If it is in process already, then I don't need to do anything. Just let me know if you need my help in any png++-related matters. :) -- Alex -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
