Quoting Adam Kropelin <akrop...@rochester.rr.com>: "I don't think it is appropriate to configure hibernate via apcupsd.conf."
I think the proper way to implement this it is irrelevant to the end-user. Facts are that a) there is user request for this feature (+1 vote from me) b) the bug reporter has provided a working patch (even if the implementation is questionable) I think it is more important that the feature be taken into account (ex. "patches welcome!, hint: do it this way") than arguing "nah, I don't think is ok" PS: just as I was preparing to send this email, I've had the first power outage since I bought my UPS last week. Luckyly this draft was in gmail, but other ton of opened apps were local - I think I saved my nervous system by changing 'shutdown' to 'hibernate'. because if i had shutdown, the display wasn't yet connected to the ups -haven't time to do so (yet another reason in favor of hibernate - keep only pc unit to prolong the on-battery time...) - so i couldn't make quick saves. -- Costin Gusa Independent IT Professional http://ro.linkedin.com/in/costinel +407.23.24.71.79 +40723.010.262 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
