> >>>>> "PR" == Petter Reinholdtsen <p...@hungry.com> writes: > PR> I fail to see an explanation on what in this bug report is related to > PR> sysv-rc and what is the expected behaviour from sysv-rc. > > PR> I can guess that rcconf removes rcX.d/ symlinks using update-rc.d and > PR> expect this to be remembered. If this is the case, rcconf do not use > PR> update-rc.d according to its documented interface. > > PR> Please provide more information. > > I was wonder what kamop@ would have to say too, but it has been a week. > Maybe rcconf can never work reliably the way it is designed. However I > recall it used to. Petter, do you have any recommendations for an > alternative to rcconf? Ultimately this bug should probably be reassigned > to rcconf. >
Humm, it seems you have been waiting me to update. However, I have also been waiting because you reassinged this bug and I didn't. So, I believe you have responsibility to explain why you reassigned this bug to others. If you want me to explain, you should ask me so. Anyway, as I noted in the changelog of 2.3, it seems something changes on update-rc.d that turned into default settings(ON setting) when call with "stop 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 .". I continue to investigate toward this but I wonder this will fix the problem you claimed. Of course, jidanni, you can send the patch for this as you've sent on other bugs. Thanks, Atsushi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
