Patrik Fimml <pat...@fimml.at> writes: > On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 07:42:37PM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: >> binNMUs were scheduled for 2.8.1-2, but all failed to build due to >> #569373. >> 2.8.2-1 has been uploaded after libgoffice had been changed, thus is >> already built against the new goffice version and a binNMU wouldn't >> change anything. #572043 has been reported against 2.8.1-2 from testing, >> which is known to be affected. Why do you think a binNMU of 2.8.2-1 >> would solve this issue? > Sounds like there was a race condition between the new goffice and the > new abiword. I know #572043 has been reported against 2.8.1-2, yet my > checking revealed that 2.8.2-1 has the same problem (at least here > on amd64, md5sum: 322bb68e575771e49353081263150e5d).
Hum, done now. Sorry for the delay. No idea how this could have happened, but seems like you're right. Marc -- BOFH #123: user to computer ratio too high.
pgpQNu8tVSO9T.pgp
Description: PGP signature
