any comment on the two points below? Thanks, Ludovico
Ludovico Cavedon wrote: > Sandro Tosi wrote: >> Did you actually checked the .deb package? >> >> Depends: mercurial (>=3D 1.4), python-gobject (>=3D 2.12.1), python-gt= k2 >> (>=3D 2.10), python-cairo, python (<< 2.6), python (>=3D 2.5), >> python-support (>=3D 0.90.0) >=20 > The Depends you are mentioning are from 0.9.3-1. >=20 > $ dpkg-deb -I tortoisehg_0.9.3-2_all.deb > [...] > Depends: mercurial (>=3D 1.4), python-gobject (>=3D 2.12.1), python-gtk= 2 (>=3D > 2.10), python-cairo, python (>=3D 2.4), python-support (>=3D 0.90.0) >=20 > The problem should be fixed, as far as I can tell... >=20 >> so the problem it's not fixed. Also, in the bug report, it was not >> written '>=3D 2.4'. Use 'all' or '>=3D 2.5' in an updated chroot (wher= e >> both 2.5 and 2.6 are present, since both supported). >=20 > The bug report was saying: "[...] *for example* by setting > `XS-Python-Version' either to `>> 2.4' or `all'." >=20 > What's wrong with ">=3D 2.4", given that upstream wants to keep support= ing > Python 2.4? I thought it would simplify backporting. > Does it cause any harm? >=20 > Thanks, > Ludovico
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
