Am Sonntag 28 Februar 2010 10:35:05 schrieb Eric Dorland: > * Andreas Jellinghaus (a...@dungeon.inka.de) wrote: > > Build-Conflicts: should handle this, right? > > > > patch attached. > > > > Andreas > > I'm confused now. The freebsd patch earlier in this thread seems to > add a dependency on libusb2 for freebsd. Your patch adds a build > conflict on libusb-dev. Are both necessary? > well, if someone really knows freebsd well and can take care of porting openct to it, I'd be happy about it.
so far my knowledge is: the generic libusb code doesn't work well on linux, so the native driver is needed. libusb-dev should not be installed (else it could be autodetected). if freebsd needs libusb port (as the native bsd code maybe is even worse than the libusb driver): can you specify different conflicts/depends for each architecture? also I wonder how/if *bsd has hotplugging or coldplugging, and how exactly that is implemented, and how openct can mix with that. openct now uses udev again, after hal is beeing removed by most distributions. *bsd has no udev I guess, but is there any alternative? note: I'm not aware of any active bsd user on the mailing list - we maybe get one bsd mail every few months if at all. so maybe it is best to exclude openct from kfreebsd unless someone is found who can make sure it actually works and can test it? Regards, Andreas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
