On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 10:35:45AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> forcemerge 480638 571671
> thanks
> 
> On Sat, 27 Feb 2010, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > It seems that for some reason dpkg-checkbuilddeps now adds the
> > package "build-essential" to the Build-Depends, getting me:
> > $ dpkg-checkbuilddeps
> > dpkg-checkbuilddeps: Unmet build dependencies: build-essential
> 
> This is a feature and not a bug, it's also hardly new. It has been there
> for quite some time now. Merging with the pre-existing wontfix bug.
> 
> > The package build-essential is not Build Essential, nor is it
> > in my control file, nor do you Depend on it.
> 
> We recommend it. Not all dpkg-* tools require this to be installed.

The argument seems to be that you require all build essential
packages to be installed.  They all are installed, it's just
that build-essential is not installed.  I also don't agree that
build-essential should have the "Build-Essential: yes" tag.  And
it could go away if you add a Depends on build-essential.

Following policy, build-essential should not be required because
it's just a recommends.  99% of the users of dpkg-dev use it to
build packages, so I don't see why this should be a recommends.


Kurt




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to