On 25/02/10 at 10:09 -0500, Jeremy T. Bouse wrote: > tags 571416 + unreproducible wontfix > thanks > > Doesn't change the fact I can't reproduce it and won't be wasting any > time tracking it down as it's unproducible. So until you can provide a > patch showing me it's the package and not your build system here it > shall remain until hell freezes over.
>From my mail (but I don't think you read it): > > After 5 minutes of investigation, which I'm sure you could have done > > yourself, here is the problem: > > if the filesystem has sub-second precision, like tmpfs (which I'm using) > > has, it will be used by make. > > libgcgi_0.9.5.dfsg.orig.tar.gz contains Makefile.in before Makefile.am, > > so Makefile.in ends up with a timestamp older than Makefile.am. > > > > *** lu...@beothuk:/dev/shm/libgcgi-0.9.5.dfsg$ stat Makefile.am > > File: `Makefile.am' > > Size: 506 Blocks: 8 IO Block: 4096 regular file > > Device: 10h/16d Inode: 2555530 Links: 1 > > Access: (0600/-rw-------) Uid: ( 1000/ lucas) Gid: ( 1000/ lucas) > > Access: 2010-02-25 15:54:33.614583094 +0100 > > Modify: 2010-02-25 15:54:25.890582840 +0100 > > Change: 2010-02-25 15:54:25.890582840 +0100 > > *** lu...@beothuk:/dev/shm/libgcgi-0.9.5.dfsg$ stat Makefile.in > > File: `Makefile.in' > > Size: 22872 Blocks: 48 IO Block: 4096 regular file > > Device: 10h/16d Inode: 2556061 Links: 1 > > Access: (0600/-rw-------) Uid: ( 1000/ lucas) Gid: ( 1000/ lucas) > > Access: 2010-02-25 15:54:31.974609365 +0100 > > Modify: 2010-02-25 15:54:25.882583570 +0100 > > Change: 2010-02-25 15:54:25.882583570 +0100 > > > > As a result, the refresh rule in Makefile is called, and fails. Do you want me to provide a patch that adds automake to your build-deps, or can you do that? -- | Lucas Nussbaum | lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
