On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 03:23:54PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > Mathias Gug <math...@ubuntu.com> writes: > > > Correct. That was a difference implemented in Ubuntu as the result of the > > package review to move puppet into main [1]. It turns out that the review > > points back to Debian bug 484659 which was fixed later in Debian. > > > [1]: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/puppet/+bug/408297 > > [2]: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=484659 > > Those appear to be templates created by the user in the process of > building a Puppet configuration. Those are not configuration files owned > by a package, and should not be removed on package purge in my opinion. > They're equivalent to additional logrotate rules written by the > administrator in /etc/logrotate.d or additional xinetd configuration files > put in /etc/xinetd.d, neither of which are removed on purge of the > relevant packages.
I agree. It seems we have a fairly clear precedent here to try and be consistent with.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
