On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 07:29:17AM +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote: > And, frankly speaking, running production services with unstable > versions of software and asking for the same level of reliability we > try putting in stable versions, tend to make you lose credit, at least
Once again: Where You have found my "asking for the same level of reliability"? This is quote from my third message on February 15, that become source of all these invectives: "this is production service and I can not experiment with it." That's all! No blame! No "asking for the same level of reliability"! This was my response on asking for more detailed information. The only meaning of it is that I can't upgrade to php-5.3 in order to collect for You all error messages. It look like all of You do not read the mail when blame me on non-politeness, rudeness or similar. And finally, when thinking about source of all these talking flame, it should be note that package maintainer should have this package installed and running. I suppose, in this case there was not any questions about "particular problems" when they are obvious at least. And I think this reasonable idea make sense even for "volunteers". And now, honorable colleagues, I suggest to stop discussing the politeness. This is BTS and it is not designated for this. -- ********************************* **** Vladimir Stavrinov ****** ******* v...@inist.ru ********* ********************************* -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
