Patrik Schindler <p...@pocnet.net> writes: >> I plan to get at sending the command in case there are errors soon. >> Do you think there are other cases in which the actual command would >> be >> useful? > > From my point of view, this is often the case. For example when the > job will run some time in the future and the user forgot what command > led to the output. > > That's why I suggest to make this behaviour an option for the > submission. Perhaps it would be better to have that as atd-option?
Then I guess an option at time of submission is the way to go. > Another thingie on my wishlist would be to have at -c show an > uncluttered version of the actual command submitted, without env and > dir-exists-check. I plan to move the environmental variables and some other information to a separate file to enable use of other shells as well. That should take care of your wish as well. Regards, Ansgar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/873a10z7eg....@marvin.43-1.org
