On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 05:53:39PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-10-11 at 14:10 +0100, Antonio Marcos López Alonso wrote:
> > El Jueves 08 Octubre 2009, Ben Hutchings escribió:
> > > On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 00:03 +0100, Antonio Marcos López Alonso wrote:
> > > [...]
> > >
> > > > Googling around I found this bug is quite old:
> > > >
> > > > http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0302.1/0966.html
> > > >
> > > > And this:
> > > >
> > > > http://fixunix.com/suse/125711-problem-via-rhine-ii-eth0.html
> > > >
> > > > It seems the fix is not the same for everyone.
> > >
> > > I don't think those are the same bug as this.
> > >
> > > > Supposing the only fix by now is a kernel option, should I close this
> > > > bug?
> > >
> > > No, it should stay open until there is a proper fix.
> > >
> > > Ben.
> > >
> >
> > It seems the network is behaving quite well with noapic (and no
> > irqfixup/irqpoll) :-).
> >
> > So I shall keep this open until news are available.
>
> Please can you report this bug at <http://bugzilla.kernel.org>,
> including the fact that 'noapic' works around it. The product should be
> 'Platform Specific/Hardware' and the component 'i386'. Let us know the
> bug number so we can keep track of it.
Antonio, did you report this upstream?
Cheers,
Moritz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100215010729.ga17...@galadriel.inutil.org
