On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 04:49:34PM -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > > Hi Kurt, > > About a year ago, you wrote: > > > Package: gitk > > Version: 1:1.5.6.3-1 > > > > When looking at the history with gitk, when there is a merge, it's not > > clear at all to me what exactly got merged. > > > > It's ussually only the last commit on the developement branch > > that is merged to a stable branch. But it could also be more than 1 > > commit. > > Could you say a little more about this? Is the problem that you want > a list of patches representing the diff between a merge commit and its > first parent?
I think the main problem is that when I look at the history in git that it's unclear which patches are all applied to a branch. If you have a branch and you add a few patches to it, and then merge only the last one in an other branch, I think it looks just the same as if you've merged all the patches. I think it's just unclear what the parent is in each branch. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
