On Thu, 11 Feb 2010, Craig Small wrote: > On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 01:48:07AM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote: > > | wea...@field:~$ cat /proc/uptime ; grep 'cpu ' /proc/stat ; cat > > /proc/uptime > > | 188847.15 673325.21 > > | cpu 119994 4473784 3539322 2746621 > > | 188847.16 673325.21 > > | wea...@field:~$ getconf CLK_TCK > > | 60 > I calculate 57 which is close enough to 60, though not close enough for > procps: > case 58 ... 61 : Hertz = 60; break; > > However you were getting 45!
I've also seen other values like 7, 12, 23, 28, 35, 53. > On linux, we just use ELF notes and this problem goes away. If there > is something equivalent in freeBSD then I could use that as well. I wouldn't know, I'm just the poor DSA who gets to fight these machines. :) Maybe the debian-bsd list would know. > > [Is this in any way related to ps showing completely broken timestamps > > in the START column? If not and there isn't a bug report about that > > that ought to get filed too.] > That bug was reported in procps but was moved to kfreebsd-7 package > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=344546 > It boils down to that the freebsd procfs is incomplete. Hmm. Thanks. -- | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** Peter Palfrader | : :' : The universal http://www.palfrader.org/ | `. `' Operating System | `- http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
