On Feb 10, Kevin Coyner <kcoy...@debian.org> wrote: > The file 91-permissions.rules sets group ownership of /dev/nvram to > kmem. I presume it does this for a reason although I do not know why. > I'm concerned that the tpb rule, in setting that group ownership to > nvram, might cause new problems. Any idea why 91-permissions.rules > sets /dev/nvram to be group owned by kmem? I believe that particular > rules stems from the udev package. Because I cannot use a non-standard group in the udev package and this is the one used by other distributions. If you really believe that changing the group is appropriate (and I have many doubts about this) then do it with a rule file with priority 92.
-- ciao, Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
