On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 11:39:21PM +0200, Erwan David wrote: > Le Mon 1/08/2005, Sven Luther disait > > On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 07:02:20PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 1, 2005 at 18:55:18 +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > > > > > > I am still wondering about what emacsen has to do with ocaml-base-nox > > > > though. > > > > > > > Nothing at all. ocaml-nox, on the other hand, has a Depends: > > > emacsen-common, because dh_installemacsen adds code to the postinst > > > which needs this package. > > > emacsen-common is a tiny package, so I don't think depending on it is a > > > problem. > > > > So why is this guy mentioning that ocaml-base-nox did not install because he > > didn't want emacsen-common to install ? > > > > I still think it would be good to move the emacs stuff into a separate > > ocaml-emacs package, does this seem ok ? > > > > Friendly, > > > > Sven Luther > > in fact apt-get upgrade did not upgrade ocaml-base-no-x, but a apt-get > dist-upgrade would have done so, installing emacsen-common with it. > upgrade does not automatically install new packages.
Mmm, what did you upgrade from ? Stefano, maybe the right answer would be to have a strict version dependency between the different ocaml packages ? a ocaml -> deends ocml'base (==version) or something such ? Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
