On Wed, 27 Jul 2005, Andreas Jochens wrote: > > Thanks a lot for your patch! For the sake of completeness and upstream > > inclusion, I would love to make this a little bit more complete by > > providing some basic inline asm macros for powerpc64. This is not a big > > deal if you now what exactly what to do but it needs basic testing. Can > > you provide me with an account on such a machine? > > (http://db.debian.org/machines.cgi still seems down.) > > I only have access to one ppc64 machine which is connected to the > internet by a dialup home DSL connection. It is not possible to > access that machine remotely. But I heard rumors that IBM gives > accounts on some of their new ppc64 machines for developing and > testing purposes.
I suppose it is okay to provide a fallback for config.guess to make sure __powerpc64__ is really defined. It shouldn't matter when CLN is compile with GCC: Index: include/cln/config.h.in =================================================================== RCS file: /home/cvs/cln/include/cln/config.h.in,v retrieving revision 1.8 diff -a -u -r1.8 config.h.in --- include/cln/config.h.in 24 Jul 2005 21:20:55 -0000 1.8 +++ include/cln/config.h.in 1 Aug 2005 19:28:25 -0000 @@ -68,6 +68,10 @@ #undef __rs6000__ #endif +#ifndef __powerpc64__ +#undef __powerpc64__ +#endif + #ifndef __m88k__ #undef __m88k__ #endif Anyways, could you please confirm that CLN works (i.e. passes make check) when configured with --disable-static? Looking through old email, I see a patch from some guy at SuSE that patched CL_JUMP_TO in a way different to yours. I never bothered applying it, because the rest of that patch was apparently incomplete and couldn't ever work. If you can confirm that it works I'll apply it upstream ASAP. Regards -richy. -- Richard B. Kreckel <http://www.ginac.de/~kreckel/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
