Hi! * Barak A. Pearlmutter <ba...@cs.nuim.ie> [100123 19:44]: > To my mind, this is (a) a "wishlist" bug, certainly not RC, and (b) is > not in truth a DFSG issue. > > SUMMARY. Some documentation is available only in a difficult-to-edit > format, the latex sources used to produce that document having been > lost. The "wish" is that this were not the case.
I tend to agree with you here. As the source is appearently lost (which should be stated in Debian copyright) and Debian doesn't gain anything by removing the documents I mist say if that package would have hit NEW in this way, I as ftp assistant would have let it passed after your explanation. I would propose to set the severity of this bug to important and retitle it to "Please make it easier to edit documentation"; and whoever wants can try to reacreate the lost "source". Best Regards, Alexander
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
