On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 6:01 AM, Carlos Galisteo <cgalis...@k-rolus.net> wrote: > I've done some superficial tests on this issue and despite it seems to > be confirmed, the increased amount of memory is far from being 'huge'. > > I'll perform more intensive tests and inform upstream. > > Could you please provide quantitative details in order to compare them > with my own results?
I launched qwit with the following settings: * http proxy set * update interval: 30s * refresh search results I kept it open for about 2 hours and a suspend/resume happened during that time (not sure whether suspend/resume has anything to do with this) memory consumption shown in 'top': begin: VIRT 200+m, RES 80+m after 2hrs: VIRT 449m, RES 326m and still climbing at some point in this time the memory start climbing up faster I think. HTH. Roger -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
