Dear Neil, I am sorry for insisting:
It is NOT ONLY a problem for people migrating to newer kernel then going back to an old kernel. It is a problem for people that SIMPLY BOOT A CDROM with a newer distribution/kernel on an older distribution/kernel (which was my case). I did not want to upgrade my kernel at all. Simply booting the CDROM did corrupt my raid array with no prompt; I did not run any install/upgrade process. Regards, > -----Message d'origine----- > De : Neil Brown [mailto:ne...@suse.de] > Envoyé : jeudi 28 janvier 2010 01:28 > À : martin f krafft > Cc : RUSSOTTO François-Xavier 200103; 534...@bugs.debian.org > Objet : Re: Bug#534470: Using mdadm 2.6.7.2 to assemble a raid array > created with mdadm 1.9.0 will corrupt it making mdadm 1.9.0 to crash when > trying to reassemble > > On Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:13:36 +1300 > martin f krafft <madd...@debian.org> wrote: > > > also sprach RUSSOTTO François-Xavier 200103 <francois- > xavier.russo...@cea.fr> [2009.12.02.0407 +1300]: > > > As I suggested to Neil: prior to auto-remount a raid array, the > > > raid tool should perform a version checking so that, at least, > > > user is warned that the raid array might be corrupt performing > > > such operation. > > > > Neil, does this sound like a feasible solution to > > http://bugs.debian.org/534470? > > I don't think so. > We really want old arrays to work smoothly on new kernels. > To avoid a repartition of the original problem we would need not just a > message, but an option not to assemble the array and that would be awkward > for > people normally upgrading their system. > > So I don't think there is a solution for this problem that does not > introduce > other problems. > It does not affect x86 architectures, and is only a problem if you move to > a > new kernel, then back to an old kernel. So hopefully it will be very > rare. > > Sorry. > > NeilBrown -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
