Steve Langasek wrote: > On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 11:00:28AM -0500, Etienne Goyer wrote: >> That sounds like a regression to me, if previously working setup are >> broken on update. Is there any way the behavior could be reversed to be >> backward-compatible? > > It's a deliberate behavior change to disable weak encryption types by > default, so the only things broken are those that depend on weak encryption > types. You're welcome to try to persuade the Kerberos guys to revert > this...
I do not see the point in trying; they must be aware of the consequence of that behavior change already. That being said, from the distribution point of view, would it be appropriate to take measure to ensure the user base is not left to figure out why their Kerberos authentication is broken on update by themselves? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
