A. Christine Spang <sp...@mit.edu> (25/01/2010): > I think that this is not an RC bug since this is a version of the > package in experimental that will not go into unstable until I have > some certainty as to whether upstream is actually going to cut it as > a stable release. And at this rate, it's already been *years* of > waiting for that.
Oh, too bad. :) Anyway, that's still RC (within experimental) since it now fails to build on a release arch where it built before. There's no big deal with letting this bug as important anyway; the idea is more to make sure you know about the FTBFS before you plan to move it to unstable, since it would be (with or without an RC bug) holding up migration to testing. > So, do feel free to submit a patch, though I think it is not super > high priority since the version in unstable/testing seems to be > fine. I'll try and keep an eye on this one, it might be the FTGL headers at fault, not necessarily your package. Mraw, KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
