On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 03:01:35PM +0100, Torsten Werner wrote: > On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 12:04 AM, brian m. carlson > <sand...@crustytoothpaste.ath.cx> wrote: > > Yes. Even if someone were to disagree that this bug is grave, at the > > very least, this is serious, since nobody can reasonably claim that the > > package in this state is suitable for release. > > We have had 2 stable releases with this bug and upstream didn't know > about the bug 2 days ago. That is why I think it is reasonable to > downgrade the severity to important.
Honestly, I'm not really that invested in the severity of the bug, as long as we get a fixed version soon. I'd really like to be able to build my website with ant, and this bug is a blocker for that. Do be aware of a couple of things, though. First, as long as Java networking is broken, anytime the resolver returns a null result wrongly, it breaks the lookup. This is also a problem when network access is slow, unreliable, or prohibited by policy (configurations which we support). Also, anytime a W3C DTD or schema wrongly gets a null result, it will result in a validation failure, since W3C blocks repeated requests from Java (because they don't need an even bigger bandwidth bill). Since XHTML is almost certainly the most common XML application, and DocBook is also very common, the resolver breaks a very significant portion of the XML applications that are commonly used in Debian. -- brian m. carlson / brian with sandals: Houston, Texas, US +1 713 440 7475 | http://crustytoothpaste.ath.cx/~bmc | My opinion only OpenPGP: RSA v4 4096b 88AC E9B2 9196 305B A994 7552 F1BA 225C 0223 B187
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
