Hi Matija, On Thursday 21 January 2010, Matija Nalis wrote: > I've check SVN rev.1813 (latest as of 2010-01-21) and according to > the changelog it seems you did try to include this patch. > It however seems to have not been successful.
as you noticed ... I failed here. > The changelog for 20.Dec.2009 lists (among other things): > > "* Add 42_check_linux_raid_fix_r10.dpatch, which fixes RAID Levels with > more than one digit, thanks to Matija Nalis (Closes: #534604, #514588)" > > However, 42_check_linux_raid_fix_r10.dpatch really fixes only > #534604, while #514588 is related to check_ping fix (which I do > not see fixed in this SVN revision). I just fixed #534604 but not #51458, the changelog is just wrong. But I pinged upstream about you patch, if its a valid change for all conditions ... Actually there is just more evaluation needed by upstream. > The only connection between the two bugs is that both were reported > by me, so that probably could have created the error. That is totally true. Thanks for pointing out. With kind regards, Jan. -- Never write mail to <w...@spamfalle.info>, you have been warned! -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.12 GIT d-- s+: a C+++ UL++++ P+ L+++ E--- W+++ N+++ o++ K++ w--- O M V- PS PE Y++ PGP++ t-- 5 X R tv- b+ DI D+ G++ e++ h---- r+++ y++++ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
