Hallo Eduard, El sáb, 30-07-2005 a las 22:23 +0200, Eduard Bloch escribió: > #include <hallo.h> > * Javier Kohen [Sat, Jul 30 2005, 02:17:14PM]: > > > Until recently I was using the AMD64 archive and proceeded to install > > sl-modem-daemon from upstream's source, as Debian doesn't have this > > package on that architecture. Back then it seemed to work nicely with > > my VIA82XX modem through ALSA. Now I'm back on i386 and after > > installing this package I just get an error message saying that module > > snd_intel8x0m cannot be found; that's certainly not the driver that > > corresponds to my modem. > > > > I based my old init.d script in Debian's, but I just changed all > > module occurences from intel to VIA, and that seems to be enough. > > Perhaps for Debian both have to be tried in turn? > > Maybe. I hate hardcoding things, and what you suggest sounds like that. > There is at least one other driver using sl-modem-daemon for > non-SmartLink modems, and I expect other to come. So what will happen > next? > > sl-modem-daemon is a product created for SmartLink modems and those are > accessible via the snd-intel8x0m module.
Hey, easy man, this a SmartLink modem what I have here :) $ lspci -n | grep 11.6 0000:00:11.6 0780: 1106:3068 (rev 80) $ lspci | grep 11.6 0000:00:11.6 Communication controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. Intel 537 [AC97 Modem] (rev 80) I read somewhere that the Intel 537 part of the description is an error in the PCI database. Anyway, it doesn't work with the Intel module, while it does with the VIA one. From the driver's README: Supported Hardware ================== HAMR5600 based AMR/CNR/MDC/ACR modem cards on the following Southbridge chips: - Intel ICH0,ICH2, ICH3, ICH4 - Via 686A, 686B, 8231, 8233 - SiS 630 - ALI 1535. SmartPCI56/561/562/563 based PCI modem cards. SmartUSB56 based USB modem. ----- VIA8233 is what I have. > Does my init script work if you load the module _before_ the script > runs? No, it doesn't, because your script fails after unsuccessfully trying to load the Intel module, which I don't have. As I mentioned, I used to run your script with only a simple modification: replacing all references to the Intel module for the VIA one. Regards, -- Javier Kohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ICQ: blashyrkh #2361802 Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
