One more piece of information... On 2010-01-20 14:58:58 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On 2010-01-20 13:38:34 +0000, Kai Hendry wrote: > > http://validator.nu/?doc=http://www.vinc17.net/test/url-accented-latin1.html > > It seems that the validator uses XHTML5[*] (which I don't use, see > the DOCTYPE of my page) and the rules have changed for XHTML5. In > short, I'd see that as a bug in the validator. > > [*] Info: Using the preset for XHTML5+ARIA, SVG 1.1 plus MathML 2.0 > (experimental) based on the root namespace.
The W3C validator validates my page as XHTML 1.0 Strict: http://qa-dev.w3.org/wmvs/HEAD/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.vinc17.net%2Ftest%2Furl-accented-latin1.html&charset=%28detect+automatically%29&doctype=Inline&group=0 Also, there are no problems with Firefox (it would be a bug to display an application/xhtml+xml page that is not valid). -- Vincent Lefèvre <vinc...@vinc17.net> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.net/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.net/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / Arénaire project (LIP, ENS-Lyon) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
