* e...@buici.com <e...@buici.com> [20100118 03:28]: > On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 06:46:36PM +0200, Paul Slootman wrote:
[bsign for archs other than i386] > > Well, if you prevent it being compiled, then it'll never get tested... > > In other words, I'd recommend adding those architectures where there's a > > possibility it will work; if it doesn't, I'm sure you'll get bug reports > > soon enough :-) In that case, remove the corresponding arch. > I recognize your logic. The thing is that the relevent code is being > completely reworked. IMHO, it is better for folks to test the real > version for them instead of finding bugs in code that will soon be > replaced. The 386 code has been tested by me for a few years, so I > have confidence that it works. > My logic may not satisfy you, but there it is. Are there any news on this issue in the meanwhile? I just noticed that bsign is still i386-only. regards, -mika-
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
