Sven Hartge said: >Um 16:15 Uhr am 06.01.10 schrieb Sven Hartge: > >>>> Next interesting find: If I recompile using -O0 (i.e. without any >>>> optimization), haveged works fine. >>> And again, using -O1 results in the following (different) backtrace. >=20 >>> Maybe not a eglibc bug, but a bug inside haveged, which is know to be >>> compiler dependant for its "magic". >=20 >> Yes, using gcc-4.3 instead of gcc-4.4 "resolves" this bug. > >I did a quick test with 4.5-20091226 from experimental and the segfault >appears as well.
Thanks. I've added a dependency on gcc-4.3 and will try to get 0.9-2 out tonight. -- Steve Kostecke <st...@debian.org> Public Key at gopher://kostecke.net or `finger st...@kostecke.net` -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
