affects 565213 - apt-listchanges thanks
On Sat, 16 Jan 2010 10:40:53 -0800 Ryan Niebur wrote: [...] > On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 12:05:38PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote: > > affects 565213 apt-listchanges > > quit > > > > > > On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 21:44:02 -0800 Ryan Niebur wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 06:40:00PM +0100, David Kalnischkies wrote: > > [...] > > > > i also wonder > > > > a bit if this .disabled thing is something dpkg likes... > > > > > > looks like apt-listchanges does the .disabled thing as well. > > > > Hi Ryan, > > let's notify the BTS of this fact, then... > > > > I hadn't actually looked closely or tested, so I didn't want to do > that. and because of the test, it actually proceeds even if > apt-listchanges isn't there. OK, let's discard this notification, then... > > apt-listchanges: > /bin/sh: /usr/bin/apt-listchanges: No such file or directory > Preconfiguring packages ... > > apt-listbugs: > /bin/sh: /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs: No such file or directory > E: Sub-process /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs apt || exit 10 returned an error code > (10) > E: Failure running script /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs apt || exit 10 > > I'm thinking that we should probably be better about this. As explained in my message http://bugs.debian.org/565213#37 I disagree. IMHO, if apt-listbugs does *not* work, the installation/upgrade should fail, *not* silently proceed! I hope this clarifies my take on this matter. -- http://www.inventati.org/frx/progs/scripts/pdebuild-hooks.html Need some pdebuild hook scripts? ..................................................... Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
pgpRvO7Ij0jyv.pgp
Description: PGP signature
