В Чтв, 14/01/2010 в 14:20 -0800, Brian V. Smith пишет: > Are you saying you have some patch file that fails on a hunk in u_print.c? > Where did you get that patch file? I only publish complete sources.
Siting what Tomas Hoger said at redhat's bugzilla: " The patch against Debian packages that was posted with the report seems to be a copy of the xfig-3.2.5-mkstemp.diff from Fedora. However, compared to 3.2.3 and 3.2.4 patches in RHEL, it is missing one hunk that got lost during 3.2.4 -> 3.2.5 forward-port for this case: u_print.c: sprintf(tmp_fig_file, "%s/%s%06d", TMPDIR, "xfig-fig", getpid()); " And that what I had in mind talking about missed hunk. I've checked that other places are patched both in Debian and in xfig 3.5.2b while this line is still unpached in both places. BTW, there is another place: d_text.c: sprintf(preedit_filename, "%s/%s%06d", TMPDIR, "xfig-preedit", getpid()); but it not used neither in Redhat's builds nor in our and very probably that Debian does not use this code too. Still may be it's good idea to fix this upstream. > Also, I don't have anything to do with Debian except to help Roland Rosenfeld > when he has problems/questions about xfig/transfig. While the problem exist in both places I thought this is good idea to document solution in one. If this was bad idea, please, tell me and I'll try to avoid this in future. Thanks for your answers, -- Peter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
