and it would not even try to install an updated version if such is available? i.e. proper imho way would be first to remove all Build-Conflicts and then only satisfy Build-Depends, and then check if Build-Conflicts detects any conflict and then only fail.
or it just removes it and then fails since it does not try to satisfy build-depends again? looking at install_deps of ./lib/Sbuild/Build.pm it seems to have that loopy behavior where first it removes conflicts and then tries to install dependencies... may be I am reading it wrong though. I guess, enough of theory, I will just upload -2 and see how it goes ;) On Wed, 13 Jan 2010, Julien Cristau wrote: > The effect of Build-Conflicts on buildds is that this package gets > removed. If this is something you build-depend on, you'll need a > versioned Build-Depends, not a Build-Conflicts. -- .-. =------------------------------ /v\ ----------------------------= Keep in touch // \\ (yoh@|www.)onerussian.com Yaroslav Halchenko /( )\ ICQ#: 60653192 Linux User ^^-^^ [175555] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org