On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 02:58:12PM -0800, Richard A Nelson wrote: > Your point about default alternatives is a valid one, and yes, for most > folk, and until this is squared away, my bias would be to put portmap > first, then rpcbind.
> I still think supporting both programs is proper. We need to either support both programs or drop the old portmap entirely but like I say we need some sort of idea of where we're trying to get to in order to do that. Unfortunately the portmap/rpcbind maintainer isn't talking and the general bugginess with which this has been handled so far means it doesn't seem like a good idea to jump in without any coordination since playing guessing games involves the risk of having to repeatedly upload, or at worst cause disruption to users by needlessly dragging them into this mess. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
