severity 554953 important thanks On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 05:22:10PM +0100, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote: > Hi, > > your following mail has the following header set: > To: cont...@bugs.debian.org, 554...@bugs.debian.org > > > notfound 559533 0.59.0-1 > > found 559553 0.59.1~rc1 > > thanks > > > > This bug actually only affects sbuild in the git repo. > > So your note seems to have gone to the wrong bug. Could > you verify and confirm/undermine this so that not everybody going > through the list of rc bugs has to verify weither your > note or the 'found' mark of the BTS are right about this > RC bug?
This bug is not RC. It should probably be downgraded to important. There's no problem with the packages in Debian; there is a bug if you replace the buildd package in use by buildds with the one in unstable or git. This is due to a configuration file difference which doesn't affect upgrades using versions provided in the official repos. There are patches to rectify this in any case which just need reviewing before applying them (on the buildd branch of sbuild.git). The control mail didn't use the wrong number AFAICT--Andres just CCd the wrong bug, so the actual change was correct. Regards, Roger -- .''`. Roger Leigh : :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/ `. `' Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/ `- GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848 Please GPG sign your mail.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
