Hi Florian,

On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 11:53:08PM +0100, Florian Ernst wrote:
> Package: apt-listbugs
> Version: 0.1.2
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
> 
> Hello all,
> 
> commit da6864ae240d2ea2458b1c53aca2675ed1985f04 appears to have been
> based on assumptions current reality fails to provide:
> "Package has a Depends on libdpkg-ruby1.8 (>= 0.3.3) which cannot be
> satisfied on *."
> <http://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php?dist=unstable&package=apt-listbugs>
> 
> And indeed, such a package version is nowhere to be seen at the moment,
> thus rendering apt-listbugs 0.1.2 uninstallable on all architectures.
> 
> Ryan, as you intent to adopt dpkg-ruby, I take it you wanted to release
> a new version / have released a new version privately already, that
> somehow didn't yet make it into the archives?
> 

It's been uploaded already (at the same time as apt-listbugs). However
since it added new binary packages, it got stuck in NEW.
http://ftp-master.debian.org/new/dpkg-ruby_0.3.3.html

Sorry, I should have uploaded dpkg-ruby first and waited for it to be
ACCEPTed before uploading apt-listbugs. It slipped my mind that it
would have to go through NEW.

So now we wait for the ftp team to ACCEPT the new dpkg-ruby.

Cheers,
Ryan

-- 
_________________________
Ryan Niebur
ryanrya...@gmail.com

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to