reassign 551707 bash-completion thanks On Sun, 27 Dec 2009 at 22:49:31 +0100, David Paleino <da...@debian.org> wrote:
> dlocate maintainers: you could also consider letting us (bash-completion) > handle the completion upstream; this way we would keep it up-to-date with our > API (see note about _get_pword in >1.1). > > If you want it to be included upstream, please file a bug against us, I will > handle that. Thanks :) that would be greatly appreciated, thanks. /etc/bash_completion.d/dlocate was provided by a dlocate user, and I don't use it myself. I just tested that it worked (it did, back in June) and accepted it. how should we handle this? should I release a new dlocate without completion first, or will you divert the completion file to your package? craig -- craig sanders <c...@taz.net.au> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
