Mike Hommey wrote: > Considering that libreadline-dev is now a real package, I wonder why > that should necessary at all. Keeping the current build-deps also makes > backporting easier (though backporting is useless atm, since the > packages in testing are installable on stable)
Current Build-Depends is libreadline5-dev | libreadline-dev. I believe "libreadline-dev | libreadline5-dev" will be better, both for the 5 to 6 transition and backporting. Cheers, Trafire -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
