Am Donnerstag, den 17.12.2009, 20:11 -0500 schrieb nobled: > There hasn't been much activity on bug #483724 - doesn't it require > gnupg 1.x to convert to update-alternatives first? Is that still on > the todo list?
The suggestion to use update-alternatives hasn't been forgotten. However, there are currently no plans to do this now. The implications of this action should be examined first. This will probably happen in the near furture, when we also examine how to handle the new gnupg 2.1 series. Tagging this wontfix for the moment. Regards, Daniel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
