Hi Holger, Peter,
2009/12/15 Petter Reinholdtsen <p...@hungry.com>:
> [Holger Levsen]
>> Hi Raphael,
>>
>> would you recommend doing so already for lenny based installs?
Of course. readahead-fedora has many more advantages and I treat any
sort of regression (compared to readahead-list) as a bug.
>
> I would love to do this, if we backported the unstable version to
> Lenny. The package is currently missing in Lenny. We would need to
> drop the ionice stuff which depend on a newer version of dpkg, but as
> we will run readahead in the foreground, that would not be a big
> problem.
>
That's right. The files that require a newer dpkg are the
{early,later}-readahead init scripts (they are both generated from a
single file in the source package) and the daily cronjob.
There's no real reason to use s-s-d on the daily cronjob, as /usr is
already mounted, so I could simply make that change directly on the
package. Feel free to file a wish.
Cheers,
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Developer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
