Frans Pop, le Mon 14 Dec 2009 16:36:04 +0100, a écrit : > On Monday 14 December 2009, Anton Zinoviev wrote: > > Now I see that maybe this is not the best possible cycle. Do you think > > that it will be an improvement if I change the layout switch cycle to be > > first->second->first->third->first->second->first->third-> and so on? > > Following the rule of least surprise I think it should simply be first -> > second -> third -> first -> etc.
Again, that's not possible. Since the Linux kernel permits to toggle only one modifier at a time, only power-of-two cycles can be implemented. By extension, anything that divides a power-of-two can also be used, but that still excludes cycles with an odd length. Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
