On Thu, 2009-12-10 at 15:37 +0100, Adrian Knoth wrote: > Hi! > > I've just talked to Paul Davis, ardour author: > > 15:11 < las> ------------- > 15:11 < las> paul[186]>c++filt > 15:11 < las> _ZTIN4Vamp17PluginAdapterBaseE > 15:11 < las> typeinfo for Vamp::PluginAdapterBase > 15:11 < las> paul[187]>c++filt > 15:11 < las> _ZTIN11_VampPlugin4Vamp17PluginAdapterBaseE > 15:11 < las> typeinfo for _VampPlugin::Vamp::PluginAdapterBase > 15:11 < las> ------------------ > 15:12 < las> adi: the vamp plugins in the ardour source tree are based on a > vamp library version with different (newer, i think) namespaces > than the one in your syslibs > 15:12 < las> adi: you can't mix & match this stuff > 15:13 < adi> That's what I suspected. When I diff the header files, our local > one misses one (probably important) line. > 15:14 < adi> _VAMP_SDK_HOSTSPACE_BEGIN(PluginLoader.h) > 15:15 < adi> That one is missing, also the HOSTSPACE_END line at the end. > 15:15 < adi> IOW, updating the VAMP libs in Debian should be the better > option? > 15:15 < las> adi: this is precisely the kind of reason why the syslibs thing > is > an issue. if you are going to use syslibs, the real patch needs > to > be to NOT build and use the vamp plugins within ardour > 15:16 < las> adi: that mini-library exists because ardour only actually needs > a > 2 or 3 VAMP plugins and it seemed easier to include them with > the > program since they are not really "optional" > > > So we need a newer VAMP SDK in Debian. After that, this intermediate > patch can be removed:
The correct fix is to build using the system VAMP. The problem was caused by a mismatch of the included and the system VAMP, because the program was built with the included, but the system one was used at runtime. -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
