On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 11:47:32AM +0100, Michal Čihař wrote: > The gsynaptics version in unstable is shown wrongly - even older version > than is in oldstable. The package seems to properly exists in unstable > Packages files (at least amd64 which I did check). > > Both following pages show 0.9.7-1 as version in unstable: > > http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/gsynaptics.html > http://packages.debian.org/source/unstable/gsynaptics > > However unstable has 0.9.16-3.
i've recently been seeing this with ldm as well: http://packages.qa.debian.org/l/ldm.html http://packages.debian.org/source/unstable/ldm reports 2:2.0.6-4 for unstable. although most architectures, except hurd-i386, have version 2:2.0.48-1 in testing and unstable. seems gsynaptics is also very outdated on hurd-i386, so my guess is that has something to do with it. thanks for maintaining packages.qa.debian.org! live well, vagrant -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
