On Sunday 06 December 2009, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > Now, if it is a clean chroot, there should be no indication that > there is selinux around. Of course, if the chroot mounts /proc from the > host, and tells us lies about the state of things, then all bets are > off, and we live with the warning messages that come from programs > believing that the /proc we are reading is telling the truth.
As already mentioned, the host does not use selinux either. So even if /proc was mounted, it should not have made any difference. I'm not 100% sure if /proc was mounted or unmounted at the time (I did mount it at some point in the chroot, but am unsure exactly when and whether it made a difference this issue). I can try to reproduce and check if needed. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
