On Sat, Dec 05, 2009 at 10:15:05PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Sat, Dec 05, 2009 at 01:39:01PM +0100, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 05, 2009 at 11:29:26AM +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote: > > > it would be nice if nmudiff had a '--tagpending' to include the needed > > > control@ > > > command to tag as pending the closed bugs in the NMU. > > I agree that it would be a good idea to support tagpending in nmudiff, > > but I disagree that nmudiff should do it on its own. > > I'm not sure I understand the concern. nmudiff is already adding +patch > tags, why can't it add also +pending upon request? For instance, when I > do DELAYED uploads, I always hand-patch the "tags +" line by adding > "pending", nmudiff can do that for me (in fact, it would even be a sane > default when --delay is passed). > > What tagpending additionally does is (I believe) checking which bugs > should not be tagged pending as they already are. nmudiff should ignore > that, as the mail is going to be sent to the BTS anyhow.
Yep. That was the case I'm thinking about, but probably you are right. So no objections from my side anymore ;) Regards Patrick -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
