Hi,

I've heard nothing from ISC in regards to this bug, could someone please advise 
me of it's status.

Kind Regards,

Stewart



> Subject: [ISC-Bugs #19962] AutoReply: dhcpd 3.1.1 fails to assign IP 
> addresses when DNS names are used in the 'failover peer' stanza. 
> From: dhcp-b...@isc.org
> To: sp...@live.com
> Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 15:20:18 +0000
> 
> 
> Greetings,
> 
> This message has been automatically generated in response to the
> creation of a trouble ticket regarding:
>       "dhcpd 3.1.1 fails to assign IP addresses when DNS names are used in 
> the 'failover peer' stanza.", 
> a summary of which appears below.
> 
> There is no need to reply to this message right now.  Your ticket has been
> assigned an ID of [ISC-Bugs #19962].
> 
> Please include the string:
> 
>          [ISC-Bugs #19962]
> 
> in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. To do so, 
> you may reply to this message.
> 
>                         Thank you,
>                         dhcp-b...@isc.org
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Hi There,
> 
> In discussion with the Debian package maintainer for dhcpd, it's been 
> recommended I submit a bug report upstream to ISC about dhcpd 3.1.1.
> 
> There is a detailed description of the problem available at 
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=537557, however the crux of 
> it is that dhcpd fails to work properly when DNS names are used in the 
> 'address' and 'peer address' options within the 'failover peer' stanza.  This 
> is despite the fact that the dhcpd.conf(5) man page says in several 
> references that using both IP addresses and DNS names are accepted.
> 
> When I use IP addresses within 'failover peer', failover works and IP address 
> assignment works.
> 
> However when I use DNS names, failover does not work and both the failover 
> peers believe they are the one true (authoritative) DHCP server.  They 
> individually DHCPOFFER different IP addresses to a DHCP client on the LAN 
> segment.
> 
> In addition to this, IP address assignment from both servers only partially 
> works.
> 
> In the case of Debian's dhcp3-server 3.1.1-lenny2 (which is built from ISC 
> dhcpd 3.1.1 source tree), IP addresses are assigned out, but dhcpd does not 
> provide the DHCP client with 'option domain-name-servers' information.
> 
> In the case of Debian's dhcp3-server-ldap 3.1.1-lenny2 (which I'm told is 
> built from ISC dhcpd 3.1.1 + a 3rd party patch), IP address assignment stops 
> altogether.
> 
> The fact that it doesn't properly work in either instance, may or may not 
> indicate that the 3rd party patch for LDAP is not the source of the problem.
> 
> Would you be so kind as to review the bug report history at 
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=537557 and let me know what 
> ISC's assessment of this bug is?
> 
> If there is any further information I that you require, please do not 
> hesitate to contact me.
> 
> Kind Regards,
> 
> Stewart
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> What goes online, stays online Check the daily blob for the latest on what's 
> happening around the web
> http://windowslive.ninemsn.com.au/blog.aspx
                                          
_________________________________________________________________
A world FIRST in property search has arrived! Check out Domain Radar NOW!
http://clk.atdmt.com/NMN/go/157631292/direct/01/

Reply via email to