[...] > > libgtk is a library and I bet you would still have another bunch of > "useless" libraries installed even if amarok dropped GTK dep. However, > it's true that libgtk AND its dependencies are rather huge and might seem > suboptimal for such a thing as iPod covers (esp. if you don't the device). > > What's more, GDK should be in its own library package anyway, but not > bundled with libgtk2.0-0. > > > Don't know if it's enough for you, or clear. If it's easy to do and that > > my argument convinced you, please do it. If it takes too much time, > > please don't. > > Splitting package per se is easy. But dealing with frustrated users > afterwards is not so much fun. However, if you are willing to write a > patch which makes libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0 usage optional, I will probably > include it in packaging and/or push it upstream. Offensive file is > src/collection/ipodcollection/handler/IpodHandler.cpp >
Hmm, as I'm not a developper and that this file is quite large, I don't think I would succeed in doing that. Maybe sould we forward this upstream and ask them if it's possible to do so ? As they got a clear vision on the code, that might be a lot more easier for them. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
