On 26-Nov-2009, Mark Hindley wrote: > On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 09:49:31AM +1100, Ben Finney wrote: > > It now has occasional stretches of full-CPU usage, often a few > > minutes long; but the usage does at least drop back to a > > negligible idle state after a while. > > Well that is progress at least. > > Could you try this patch on top of the last and see if it helps any > more?
With both these patches (8c7a9ed and c99bd95) applied, I'm now seeing ‘apt-cacher’ processes maintain a negligible CPU usage, even when APT is fetching from them. This is highly imprecise (I'm just watching ‘htop’) and I haven't put any significant stress onto it, but is a good sign. I would encourage anyone else experiencing the behaviour reported in this bug report to try these patches and report the results. -- \ “A man's only as old as the woman he feels.” —Groucho Marx | `\ | _o__) | Ben Finney <b...@benfinney.id.au>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
