On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 02:41:38AM +0200, Modestas Vainius wrote: > Is experimental armel buildd much faster? IIRC, it has managed to build cmake > in 2 hours (without testsuite). While unstable buildds typically needed ~5 > hours to build cmake 2.6.x/2.8.0-1 (without testsuite either).
There is a fast buildd in both unstable and experimantal networks. However, the unstable network has more buildd's in total so chances of hitting a slow buildd in unstable network are greater. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
