On Mon, 23 Nov 2009, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote: > On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 11:15 PM, Don Armstrong <d...@donarmstrong.com> wrote: > > ufraw is used by convert et al. when converting from (or possibly to) > > a RAW image, and isn't suggested or recommended by imagemagick. > > I will add a suggests if you don't mind (together with all the list > below). If we count all the needed packages to convert to/from some > formats, we will need all these packages: > > autotrace, cups-bsd | lpr | lprng, curl, enscript, ffmpeg, > ghostscript, gimp, gnuplot, grads, groff-base, hp2xx, html2ps, > libwmf-bin, mplayer, netpbm, povray, radiance, sane-utils, > texlive-base-bin, transfig, ufraw, xdg-utils > > Recommending all them will pull too much packages.
Yeah, I agree that recommending them all is probably too much, but I suspect that recomending a subset like ghostscript, ufraw, netpbm, and maybe groff-base (or similar) would be the set that people would commonly use, and the rest could be suggests. I know I certainly convert raw camera pictures and ps things more often than I muck with those other formats... but that's certainly a judgement call, and involves personal preference. If you see it differently, that's fine too. Don Armstrong -- As nightfall does not come at once, neither does oppression. In both instances, there is a twilight when everything remains seemingly unchanged. And it is in such twilight that we all must be most aware of change in the air -- however slight -- lest we become unwitting victims of the darkness. -- William O. Douglas http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
