On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 10:11:20PM +0100, Joachim Reichel wrote: > @Steve:
> As far as I can see there is no other package in the archive containing > ipelets (apart from Ipe itself). Not yet sure whether I'll put the > plugins in libcgal4 or whether I'll generate another binary package > called libcgal-ipelets or similar. (Or are you aware of a naming > convention for ipelet packages outside the archive?) I'm not aware of any ipelet package naming convention. On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 10:21:20PM +0100, Joachim Reichel wrote: > I just noticed a new thread on the cgal-develop mailing list. Ipe 6.x > plugins will not work in 7.x and changes to the source code are required. > > Steve, I guess you do not plan to maintain two ipe version in parallel, > right? In this case I'll delay Marc's request until CGAL 3.6 with > (hopefully) ipelets for Ipe 7 is released. Correct. I plan to maintain a single version of Ipe, which will switch to Ipe 7.x with the next upload. Cheers, -Steve
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
