Perhaps (by the way, I'd not have used the term "incorrect" if I'd made the report, since that prejudges the issue).
I don't see a package for disorder, and can only guess which upstream source it might be. Reading http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2109/rfc2109.txt I see in section 5.1 several examples, with a comment relating the POST path in them to the prefix. That would be the same path as Lynx is checking if you ran it with a -trace option and captured the details. Looking at a Lynx trace file, it seems that the path could begin with /cgi-bin Firefox does retain the path in its cookie representation; Opera does not appear to do this; Konquerer has a poor reputation in any case - so much for examples - let's stick to the RFC as stated. (a trace file from Lynx running with disorder would show the corresponding POST or GET, with the path). -- Thomas E. Dickey <dic...@invisible-island.net> http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
